Nebraska EPIC Choice | Consumption Tax Plan: Particulars & Evaluation

Key Findings

  • A possible Nebraska poll initiative, generally known as the EPIC Choice, would get rid of all revenue, property, and inheritance taxes and substitute them with a statewide consumption taxA consumption tax is often levied on the acquisition of products or companies and is paid instantly or not directly by the patron within the type of retail gross sales taxes, excise taxes, tariffs, value-added taxes (VAT), or an revenue tax the place all financial savings is tax-deductible.
    of seven.5 %.
  • The proposed fee is predicated on flawed calculations that don’t replicate the tax baseThe tax base is the full quantity of revenue, property, property, consumption, transactions, or different financial exercise topic to taxation by a tax authority. A slender tax base is non-neutral and inefficient. A broad tax base reduces tax administration prices and permits extra income to be raised at decrease charges.
    outlined within the underlying proposal.
  • TaxA tax is a compulsory fee or cost collected by native, state, and nationwide governments from people or companies to cowl the prices of normal authorities companies, items, and actions.
    Basis calculations counsel that the EPIC plan would require a statewide consumption tax fee of 21.6 % or extra.
  • The EPIC Choice doesn’t forestall native governments from enacting consumption taxes, which means the full fee might be a lot larger than marketed.
  • EPIC would seemingly end in substantial cross-border procuring, permitting Nebraskans near a border with a decrease gross sales taxA gross sales tax is levied on retail gross sales of products and companies and, ideally, ought to apply to all last consumption with few exemptions. Many governments exempt items like groceries; base broadening, similar to together with groceries, might hold charges decrease. A gross sales tax ought to exempt business-to-business transactions which, when taxed, trigger tax pyramiding.
    state to avail themselves of the decrease charges whereas leaving taxpayers within the inside of the state to bear the brunt of the newly established consumption tax.
  • The anticipated financial advantages of the proposed tax overhaul are unlikely to materialize beneath such a excessive consumption tax fee.
  • Policymakers searching for to constrain property taxes have better-targeted methods to realize these goals.


No state has ever abolished the property taxA property tax is primarily levied on immovable property like land and buildings, in addition to on tangible private property that’s movable, like autos and tools. Property taxes are the one largest supply of state and native income within the U.S. and assist fund faculties, roads, police, and different companies.
, which is way and away the first supply of native authorities income in each state, however an bold Nebraska proposal would make the Cornhusker State the primary to take action—and that’s simply scratching the floor. The EPIC Choice, which stands for Eradicate Property, Earnings (and Inheritance), and Company Taxes,[1] would do what it says on the label, repealing nearly all of Nebraska’s taxes and changing them with a broad-based consumption tax at an enticingly low fee of seven.5 %. Sadly, there’s an issue with the substances checklist. Whereas proponents tout a research they commissioned figuring out a 7.23 % revenue-neutral consumption tax fee,[2] and the formal proposal is for a 7.5 % fee,[3] a Tax Basis evaluation finds that the speed would have to be at the very least 21.6 % to offset the foregone income. Concentrating state and native tax revenues in a single exceedingly high-rate tax, furthermore, would have deleterious financial results. Slightly than facilitating financial progress, this extremely anomalous tax would undercut the state’s competitiveness.

Hovering property tax burdens are a real concern, and it’s applicable for policymakers to hunt options. Advocates of the EPIC Choice are appropriate, furthermore, that consumption taxes are extra conducive to progress than revenue taxes, introducing fewer financial distortions and making a extra favorable setting for funding and job creation. Nonetheless, it’s potential to have an excessive amount of of a superb factor, particularly if the ensuing system is so radically completely different than these of different states as to create uncompetitive arbitrage alternatives. And if revenue, property, inheritance, and the present state and native gross sales taxes had been all changed by a consumption tax on the implausibly low 7.5 % fee specified within the EPIC laws, the outcome could be an unprecedented fiscal disaster, with Nebraska state and native governments dropping roughly two-thirds of their current revenues.


Tax competitors is actual, and lately, Nebraska has made a concerted effort to enact pro-growth, aggressive, tax reforms. Lawmakers continued this work in 2023 by accelerating beforehand enacted cuts to the person and company tax charges. Enacted in Could 2023, Legislative Invoice 754 will section down the state’s high marginal particular person and company tax charges to three.99 % by 2027, with preliminary reductions of each high marginal charges to five.84 % in 2024, reaching the goal three years sooner than initially projected.[4]

The identical legislation additionally replaces Nebraska’s graduated-rate company revenue taxA company revenue tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on enterprise income. Many corporations aren’t topic to the CIT as a result of they’re taxed as pass-through companies, with revenue reportable beneath the particular person revenue tax.
right into a single fee in 2025. Equally, the state’s 4 marginal particular person revenue taxA person revenue tax (or private revenue tax) is levied on the wages, salaries, investments, or different types of revenue a person or family earns. The U.S. imposes a progressive revenue tax the place charges enhance with revenue. The Federal Earnings Tax was established in 1913 with the ratification of the sixteenth Modification. Although barely 100 years previous, particular person revenue taxes are the largest supply of tax income within the U.S.
charges shall be consolidated into three starting in 2026. With these reforms, the state’s competitiveness ought to develop. Every of those modifications helps carry Nebraska according to fee reductions and different reforms adopted in competitor states.

Addressing property taxes, nonetheless, has confirmed troublesome, although it is extremely a lot a precedence for state lawmakers, who’ve devoted vital time and state sources to the duty. Nebraska owners, like their friends throughout the nation, have skilled a dramatic rise in assessed values lately, with the prospect of considerably elevated tax burdens if millages (charges) aren’t lowered commensurately.

Property tax collections mustn’t hold tempo with hovering property values as a result of the price and worth of presidency companies aren’t depending on these values. Whereas inflationInflation is when the overall value of products and companies will increase throughout the financial system, lowering the buying energy of a foreign money and the worth of sure property. The identical paycheck covers much less items, companies, and payments. It’s generally known as a “hidden tax,” because it leaves taxpayers much less well-off attributable to larger prices and “bracket creep,” whereas rising the federal government’s spending energy.
has elevated the price of authorities, there isn’t a purpose why a neighborhood the place property values have elevated by, say, 40 % ought to should remit 40 % extra in property taxes from that very same set of properties. Residents aren’t receiving 40 % extra or higher authorities for his or her cash.

State lawmakers have sought to stem the rise in property taxes by creating, and increasing, a refundable revenue tax credit scoreA tax credit score is a provision that reduces a taxpayer’s last tax invoice, dollar-for-dollar. A tax credit score differs from deductions and exemptions, which cut back taxable revenue, fairly than the taxpayer’s tax invoice instantly.
to defray the price of college district and neighborhood school actual property taxes, and by limiting fee will increase for varsity district property taxes. For owners, each measures are welcome, however they arrive with limitations that also go away many crying out for aid. Proscribing a rise in charges is of restricted utility when assessed values are rising quick sufficient to yield substantial property tax will increase beneath unchanged charges. And whereas refundable revenue tax credit do cut back the general chunk of property taxes, they don’t constrain it at its supply, leaving localities and faculty districts free to extend property tax payments, assured within the information that the state—utilizing different income sources—will defray a few of these prices. The outcome isn’t true tax aid, and even when they may obtain an offset from the state, property homeowners nonetheless see that property tax invoice and discover it justifiably upsetting.

On this context, it’s unsurprising {that a} proposal to resolve the issue in probably the most simple method—by putting off the property tax—has substantial attraction. However issues that appear too good to be true usually are. Proponents see their plan as “EPIC.” However the world of workable tax coverage is never so swashbuckling. The EPIC Choice is thrilling, however its promise withers beneath additional evaluation.

An Introduction to EPIC

As famous, the EPIC initiative goals to get rid of nearly all classes of taxation, together with tax expenditures (e.g., deductions, credit, and exemptions—a few of them tax preferences, however others forming structurally essential components of the tax code), and implement a consumption tax because the state’s major income supply, together with the upkeep of at the moment current excise taxes. The consumption tax could be imposed on a comparatively broad base, however one which nowhere close to approaches all last consumption, with vital carveouts for groceries, insurance coverage, most well being and schooling spending, and extra. Estimates commissioned by proponents counsel—implausibly—{that a} consumption tax fee of seven.23 % in 2026 and 6.52 % in 2030 might guarantee enough income, although the plan requires a fee of seven.5 %.[5] The EPIC-commissioned financial evaluation additionally observes {that a} decrease fee might prevail if the grocery exemption had been eliminated.[6]

The EPIC Choice has been superior each as laws and, now, as a possible 2024 poll measure. The poll initiative would amend the state structure to limit Nebraska state and native governments to elevating income from “retail consumption taxes and excise taxes,” eliminating property taxes, revenue taxes, gross sales taxes (apart from the alternative consumption tax), and inheritance taxes. The constitutional modification would additionally exempt groceries from taxation. It could then be as much as the Unicameral to implement the brand new consumption tax laws, although the automobile for such motion is Legislative Invoice 79 of 2024, which follows within the footsteps of a previous legislative effort in 2021, LB 133.

The EPIC laws particularly exempts a number of classes of purchases from the consumption tax, however these purchases should still be topic to different state taxes not particularly repealed. For instance, insurance coverage premiums and gasoline aren’t included within the consumption tax base however are nonetheless topic to state excise taxes. Regardless of the precept that the consumption tax wouldn’t apply to something individually topic to an excise taxAn excise tax is a tax imposed on a particular good or exercise. Excise taxes are generally levied on cigarettes, alcoholic drinks, soda, gasoline, insurance coverage premiums, amusement actions, and betting, and usually make up a comparatively small and risky portion of state and native and, to a lesser extent, federal tax collections.
, gaming—which is topic to a separate tax—is included within the consumption tax base.[7] Whereas the sale of an current construction is exempt, the companies of the agent(s) for the customer and vendor could also be topic to tax, and new building could be taxed as effectively. Groceries consumed off premises are exempt, however ready meals and meals consumed on premises aren’t. Curiously, authorities consumption and government-paid wages are topic to tax, which is unconstitutional as pertains to federal authorities workers and round for state and native workers, with no internet income generated by authorities paying itself.

Commendably, the laws exempts all intermediate transactions, avoiding what is called tax pyramidingTax pyramiding happens when the identical last good or service is taxed a number of instances alongside the manufacturing course of. This yields vastly completely different efficient tax charges relying on the size of the provision chain and disproportionately harms low-margin corporations. Gross receipts taxes are a chief instance of tax pyramiding in motion.
, the place a last product has tax embedded in it a number of instances, imposed at completely different factors of the manufacturing course of.[8] Nonetheless, these enterprise inputs at the moment comprise an estimated 44 % of Nebraska’s gross sales tax base,[9] which is unusually excessive. Transferring away from this uncompetitive system is very fascinating, and a rising variety of states are working to cut back their taxation of those transactions. However the exclusion leaves a big gap within the current gross sales tax base, which means that the newly taxed areas of non-public consumption should cowl a considerable loss towards the present base earlier than they will even start to offset revenues from revenue, property, or inheritance taxes.

Furthermore, EPIC has the potential to additional distort Nebraska’s financial system. As gross sales of newly constructed properties are topic to the consumption tax, EPIC might disincentivize house constructing. By the use of instance, a newly constructed house valued at $250,000 would price a homebuyer $304,000 after tax beneath our calculations of a revenue-neutral fee. The extra price imposed on the homebuyer, with out an related enhance within the worth of the house, could trigger homebuyers to go for current building, discouraging individuals from residing within the properties they need and making it dramatically dearer to construct new housing.

The analytical foundations underpinning EPIC are unsound. Under, we’ll analyze the assumptions used to justify the EPIC Choice and exhibit that the speed and base upon which EPIC depends will have to be dramatically elevated and expanded for EPIC to realize its targets of eliminating nearly all different classes of taxation in Nebraska.

Corrected Calculations Yield a 21.6 % Consumption Tax Fee

Proponents tout a research asserting that Nebraska’s current state revenue tax, state gross sales tax, native property tax, and native inheritance taxAn inheritance tax is levied upon a person’s property at loss of life or upon the property transferred from the decedent’s property to their heirs. In contrast to property taxes, inheritance tax exemptions apply to the dimensions of the present fairly than the dimensions of the property.
might all get replaced by a broad-based consumption tax at a fee of seven.23 %.[10] This isn’t believable, neither is the 7.5 % fee mirrored in LB 79. A Tax Basis evaluation estimates that the income alternative fee for a broad-based consumption tax in line with the EPIC plan’s language could be 21.6 % or extra.

How might EPIC’s proponents provide you with such an artificially low alternative tax fee? The reply seems to be a mix of errors and implausible assumptions.

Each the Tax Basis and the research commissioned by EPIC’s supporters rely considerably on a dataset produced by the U.S. Bureau of Financial Evaluation (BEA) detailing state-level private consumption expenditures (PCE).[11] This dataset contains, amongst different issues, each precise rental prices and what are generally known as implicit rents.

Economically talking, each a house owner and an residence renter are “consuming” housing, although the home-owner, fairly than paying hire, is both making mortgage funds or—having paid off the house—not conducting any monetary transactions. The BEA acknowledges and places a price ticket on the home-owner’s consumption of housing. This is sensible in financial phrases (absent house possession, they must pay for housing another method, and with house possession, they’ve given up capital that would in any other case be put to different makes use of) however isn’t very helpful for an evaluation of a consumption tax, since clearly owners aren’t going to be taxed on the implicit rental prices of the house they personal. Nor, we assume, would renters pay the tax.[12] These consumption prices have to be subtracted earlier than utilizing the dataset.

The EPIC-commissioned research acknowledges this and purports to take action. The determine used for private consumption, nonetheless, is in line with the headline PCE quantity (adjusted to 2026) with none subtractions, together with for precise or implicit hire. That’s the primary drawback, and it’s a vital one.

Moreover, the research doesn’t appear to make every other changes from the PCE topline quantity apart from accounting for a grocery exclusion and an exemption for schooling companies,[13] even when clearly warranted, and even supplied for by the underlying proposal. As an illustration, the language of the EPIC proposal solely taxes the share of health-care companies procured via personal out-of-pocket fee (e.g., not via insurance coverage or beneath Medicare or Medicaid),[14] however the EPIC research seems to anticipate the taxation of all well being expenditures in PCE—overstating the quantity by 800 %. Moreover, the EPIC laws exempts any good or service in any other case taxed beneath an current excise tax, however there isn’t a indication that these consumption classes had been excluded of their calculations.

Even when the aim was to tax health-care companies broadly, an adjustment must be made for Medicare- and Medicaid-funded care, which isn’t legally taxable. Federal legislation additionally prohibits taxing web entry or federal authorities actions, together with the USPS. Interstate journey prices, together with airfare, are additionally largely out of attain. Consumption by nonprofits, and Nebraskans’ consumption whereas touring, each of that are a part of PCE, additionally have to be excluded. There is no such thing as a indication, nonetheless, that the financial evaluation integrated any of those changes, and certainly their figures are inconsistent with any such adjustment.

The research additionally assumes that the state will have the ability to gather tax on one hundred pc of the share of PCE it chooses to tax. The BEA’s datasets are one of the best out there information for these estimates, which is why they’re utilized by each the Tax Basis on this evaluation and EPIC proponents of their projections, however they aren’t good, and extra importantly, no tax ever achieves full compliance. When utilizing PCE to estimate gross sales tax income, it has change into customary to imagine 85 to 90 % compliance, a tough rule of thumb designed to account for cross-border gross sales, informal gross sales, information limitations, and, after all, some stage of error and tax fraud. We selected, optimistically, to make use of 90 %, although a case could be made that this assumption is just too beneficiant, even earlier than taking into consideration the results of such a excessive fee on tax avoidance and evasion. EPIC proponents’ assumption that one hundred pc of Nebraska taxable consumption shall be taxed by the state is wildly unrealistic, even when one solely considers cross-border transactions, like an Omaha resident making a purchase order throughout the border in Iowa and paying Iowa gross sales tax as a substitute.

On the flip aspect, the research doesn’t appear to make a constructive income adjustment for nonresident spending in Nebraska. In different phrases, it wrongly contains quantities that Nebraskans spend out-of-state, both attributable to cross-border procuring (e.g., shopping for one thing in Iowa) or journey (e.g., trip spending in Hawaii), whereas additionally failing to account for the Nebraska-taxable spending of nonresidents after they go to Nebraska. We try to account for each, although that is seemingly beneficiant, as nonresidents’ willingness to place up with a 21.6 % fee could also be restricted.

In the meantime, the commissioned research anticipates producing substantial income from taxing state and native authorities purchases in addition to—most astonishingly—state and native authorities compensation. Right here, one other error slips in. About $1.7 billion in further income is supposedly generated by taxing authorities consumption, salaries, and wages, however no adjustment is made to the quantity of income the brand new tax wants to switch. After all, no income is really generated by the federal government taxing itself: the cash goes out one door and in one other. However by counting $1.7 billion in further income on one aspect of the ledger however not recognizing it as having any impact on authorities stability sheets, proponents additional contribute to the artificially low marketed consumption tax fee.

Much less considerably, the Tax Basis was unable to breed EPIC proponents’ estimates of the price of new residential building. Each the EPIC-commissioned research and the Tax Basis use BEA nationwide accounts information adjusted to yield a tough estimate of a Nebraska share. Affordable variations can emerge in calculating a state-specific share of those nationwide information (we opted to scale based mostly on Nebraska’s share of nationwide housing values), however our estimate of $3.9 billion in residential new building and enhancements is sharply divergent from EPIC’s $6.5 billion estimate.

Fee projections are based mostly on income alternative. The EPIC-commissioned research, revealed in February 2023, needed to depend on grossing up older information, whereas the Tax Basis was capable of make use of the newest income forecasts,[15] however fortuitously, these figures intently agree, with the EPIC research assuming that $11.67 billion in income would have to be changed by calendar yr 2026 whereas the Tax Basis evaluation assumes $11.81 billion. The EPIC research seems, nonetheless, to permit a nominal (non-inflation adjusted) progress fee of slightly below 2.4 % per yr, which can be unusually low, making its figures for 2030 much less believable. On the state stage, progress has been about 3 % lately, and about double that on the native stage.

These errors and questionable assumptions add up. We discover that the consumption tax base specified by the EPIC plan is simply 45 % as giant as proponents anticipated.[16] Utilizing the broad consumption tax base outlined within the EPIC modification, the income alternative fee must be 2.5 instances what proponents anticipated on a static foundation, and, if this a lot larger tax wipes out the projected dynamic progress, nearly 3 instances the marketed fee for 2026: 21.6 % fairly than 7.23 %.

The crux of the deal the EPIC Choice provides Nebraskans is to just accept a broad-based consumption tax in lieu of most current taxes. This implies taxing new building, out-of-pocket health-care bills, monetary companies, skilled companies like authorized and accounting companies (when bought by shoppers), gaming, and the like. Good arguments could be superior for taxing some or all of those classes of consumption, significantly if it ends in the elimination of different taxes. If a 7.5 % fee on this tax base, as included within the laws, might actually substitute all these different taxes, it could be a remarkably whole lot that Nebraskans could be well-advised to undertake.

However the actuality is that the breadth of the proposed EPIC consumption tax isn’t a lot broader than that of the present gross sales tax. It’s higher designed, because it avoids the taxation of enterprise inputs (a lot of which is in the end handed on to shoppers) and as a substitute captures a broader base of non-public consumption, however it’s nonetheless lower than 25 % broader than the present gross sales tax base. On this context, the issue is clear: clearly Nebraska can’t fund the elimination of the state revenue tax, native gross sales taxes, native property taxes, and the inheritance tax all by rising state gross sales tax income by lower than 25 %.

The Downside of Cross-Border Purchasing

Even a 7.5 % consumption tax fee could be the best statewide levy on related purchases within the nation, and above common even when taking into consideration different states’ native gross sales taxes. However at 21.6 %, Nebraska’s consumption tax fee would tower over every other state’s gross sales tax fee. Nebraska’s neighbors have mixed gross sales tax charges starting from 5.44 % in Wyoming to eight.65 % in Kansas, and plenty of Nebraskans stay close to a state border. This creates a considerable incentive for cross-border procuring to keep away from the burden of the proposed consumption tax. Almost 30 % of the state’s inhabitants is in Douglas County (the place Omaha is situated), located alongside the Iowa border. One other 16.5 % of the state’s inhabitants is in Lancaster County (Lincoln), significantly farther from a state boundary, however nonetheless not as far as to make cross-border procuring impractical for high-cost gadgets.

Nebraska EPIC option consumption tax plan rate compared to other state sales tax rates

Furthermore, the EPIC plan permits native jurisdictions to impose their very own consumption taxes, which might enhance the mixed tax fee above and past the 21.6 % we estimate. The uniquely excessive fee of the statewide consumption tax, mixed with the native choice tax, might end in larger charges of cross-border purchasing for these Nebraskans shut sufficient to decrease tax jurisdictions, eroding the income the state is relying on from the tax and leaving these within the inside of the state to bear the brunt of the newly elevated tax.

Researchers have investigated the incidence of cross-border procuring ensuing from modifications in gross sales tax charges. One such research centered on Nebraska and located {that a} one % enhance within the native gross sales tax fee would end in a 3.94 % enhance in cross-border procuring in a metropolis with an adjoining lower-tax jurisdiction and by 2.53 % in a jurisdiction that could be a 20-minute drive from its closest neighbor.[17] The research additionally exhibits that these incentives are enormously lowered in a locality that could be a 50-mile drive to its closest neighbor, demonstrating that proximity to decrease gross sales tax charges corresponds with larger cross-border procuring.[18] The present state-level gross sales tax in Nebraska is 5.5 %, with the common native choice gross sales tax elevating the full burden to six.96 %. This mixed fee is according to regional opponents. But when the brand new fee had been 21.6 % or extra, an Omaha resident would have a robust incentive to buy in neighboring Iowa (6.94 % mixed common fee).

The EPIC laws makes an attempt to disincentivize out-of-state cross-border procuring by requiring people to remit the consumption tax on merchandise introduced into the state for private use. Nonetheless, though the laws is unclear on this level, use taxes—that are a part of all states’ gross sales tax codes—don’t apply the place gross sales tax has already been charged.

If, for example, a Nebraska resident orders a product from Iowa and it’s shipped to her, Nebraska gross sales tax shall be charged, since gross sales taxes are usually destination-sourced. In the event that they buy the product elsewhere and, as a result of the merchandise is destined for Nebraska, no gross sales tax is charged, they might be answerable for remitting use tax (both beneath the present system or beneath the proposed EPIC tax) to Nebraska. But when they shopped in Iowa and paid Iowa gross sales tax, then Nebraska use tax wouldn’t ordinarily apply.

If the EPIC Choice contemplates imposing one other layer of Nebraska tax on a superb already taxed in one other state, this raises constitutional questions by imposing distinctive burdens on interstate commerce, as out-of-state purchases could be topic to 2 taxes. And if that isn’t the intent, and EPIC would enact a typical compensating use tax (for which client compliance has all the time been fairly low[19]), then nothing would forestall residents from saving considerably by buying items throughout state borders.

Dynamic ScoringDynamic scoring estimates the impact of tax modifications on key financial components, similar to jobs, wages, funding, federal income, and GDP. It’s a software policymakers can use to distinguish between tax modifications that look related utilizing typical scoring however have vastly completely different results on financial progress.

In recent times, it has change into extra widespread to attain tax and spending proposals dynamically (i.e., taking their financial impacts into consideration). If, for example, an revenue tax fee discount yields larger charges of funding and thus generates further state revenue, then the decrease fee will apply to a broader base of taxable revenueTaxable revenue is the quantity of revenue topic to tax, after deductions and exemptions. For each people and companies, taxable revenue differs from—and is lower than—gross revenue.
, partially defraying the federal government price of the tax discount. Tax cuts nearly by no means “pay for themselves,” however accountable tax reductions do allow financial progress that reduces their price. The Tax Basis applies dynamic scoring to federal tax proposals, as does the U.S. Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). The City-Brookings Tax Coverage Middle’s tax mannequin and the Penn Wharton Funds Mannequin additionally incorporate dynamic scoring, and appropriately so.

It’s not unreasonable, due to this fact, that the EPIC-commissioned research would try to attain these broader financial impacts. However it should be remembered that they scored a massively decrease fee. On a static foundation, the research assumed that it could take an 8.67 % fee to realize income neutrality, however taking financial progress into consideration, they landed on 7.23 % because the break-even level. If, after all, the static fee is definitely 21.6 %, the financial incentives look radically completely different, and behavioral responses to the tax will seemingly erode revenues nonetheless additional. Maybe some individuals could be favorably motivated by such a tax construction; think about, for example, a rich particular person who relied closely on out-of-state consumption however took benefit of the shortage of revenue or property taxes. Such people, after all, wouldn’t contribute a lot to the state’s coffers even when they had been drawn to the state as a result of the EPIC Choice was in place.

Then again, many current residents would discover the price of in-state purchases exorbitant and would search for authorized (cross-border procuring) and unlawful (black and grey markets) methods to keep away from the consumption tax. Proponents’ assumption that the plan would develop the taxable base is uncertain at greatest. Slightly than a constructive dynamic suggestions impact, it’s straightforward to think about a destructive one, the place the taxable base shrinks in response to the legislation.

Property Taxes and Sound Aid Options to EPIC

When structured accurately, the property tax is comparatively environment friendly. Few taxes are extra clear because the tax is levied towards homeowners based mostly on a property’s assessed worth, which is commonly shared instantly with the taxpayer. Cost, too, in lots of cases is made on to the federal government by the taxpayer, until held in escrow by a mortgage firm.

A well-designed property tax is extra impartial than most different taxes. It corresponds, albeit imperfectly, with the worth of the general advantages obtained by the property proprietor (e.g., police and hearth safety, roads, and faculties). Consequently, many potential replacements for property tax income do extra financial hurt than the tax they substitute, as could be the case with EPIC. Furthermore, the property tax is commonly one of many few income mills out there to native governments, making its reform contentious even when justified.

When property tax valuations rise sharply, as has occurred lately, taxpayers are left asking why the identical property ought to now include dramatically larger property taxes. Even when all properties in a jurisdiction see a dramatic enhance in market worth, this doesn’t routinely make it extra pricey to offer authorities companies to these properties. Owners may moderately count on to pay decrease charges when values rise, for the reason that tax’s base is now broader. That has not all the time occurred, and is the supply of appreciable frustration.

There are three major ways in which governments can restrict the expansion of property taxes: evaluation limits, fee limits, and levy (collections) limits. Evaluation limits create vital market distortions and different inequities. Fee limits do nothing to stop tax payments from hovering when assessed values rise and are probably the most simply undermined by native authorities. Levy limits prohibit income collections in probably the most impartial method, lowering general property tax millages to offset jurisdiction-wide will increase in assessed values.[20]

Fee limits are carried out to restrain native officers from rising the property tax burden via legislative will increase within the tax fee. Evaluation limits forestall a property proprietor from dropping their house when there’s a sharp rise in property valuations. There’s a sure logic to this. Whereas wealth and revenue are each measures of monetary safety, one doesn’t essentially observe the opposite. A taxpayer’s internet property could give the impression of wealth, however revenue liquidity defines fast buying energy. As property valuations rise, a taxpayer will seem wealthier, however with out a commensurate enhance in actual revenue, the taxpayer could not have the ability to afford the rise in property taxes. Evaluation limits acknowledge this discrepancy and search to stop the disparity between wealth and revenue from inflicting one to be priced out of their house.

As famous, fee limits do little to guard from surging valuations as the identical tax fee utilized to a dramatically elevated property worth will end in extra taxes owed. Evaluation limits, for his or her half, create troubling market distortions that greater than offset their coverage advantages. For instance, evaluation limits require {that a} larger share of property tax income be collected from newer or improved properties, with burdens shifted to those properties since current unsold properties are held in test. This creates a lock-in impact the place current owners are discouraged from promoting (whether or not to improve or downsize).

Equally, evaluation limits can mute the will to undertake main house renovation initiatives as a result of such initiatives may also set off a brand new tax evaluation. Additionally they discourage new building as a result of these buildings will seemingly be assessed at a better worth than a considerably related property constructed a couple of years earlier. In reality, it’s totally potential for 2 practically equivalent properties in the identical neighborhood to pay drastically completely different property taxes based mostly solely on buy date. The sum of those market distortions hurts not solely house builders and residential sellers, but additionally a neighborhood’s youthful inhabitants and lower-income households that may discover it more durable to safe a starter house, and in flip, construct wealth. Over time, evaluation limits cut back housing availability and drive up the price of residing.

Conversely, levy limits constrain income progress. This prevents native governments from reaping a windfall when property valuations rise dramatically. Whereas particular person tax legal responsibility might enhance or lower attributable to assessed values and fee modifications, income assortment within the mixture is constrained. Property tax legal responsibility remains to be related to market worth, such that some owners aren’t favored over others, however everybody sees their millages rolled again when assessed values soar. Consequently, levy limits don’t create the identical inequities that outcome from evaluation limits, and by limiting collections, they assist keep away from out-of-control tax will increase that may happen with solely a fee restrict.

Past restrictions on native authorities tax will increase, states can even defray property tax burdens via transfers or offsets, like Nebraska already does with the Nebraska Property Tax Incentive Act. Such approaches are extra sensible than the EPIC Choice, however nonetheless contain tradeoffs and require cautious design to make sure that they don’t facilitate a rise in general ranges of taxation, which might occur if future native property tax will increase aren’t constrained, and localities conclude that they’ve extra fiscal house during which to function attributable to offsetting state aid.

The simplest property tax aid packages pair collections limitations with spending restraint. Nebraska might reform and tighten its current fee and levy limits to guard owners from pointless property tax will increase with out doing something as drastic as eliminating the tax outright.


The EPIC proposal is constructed on a defective basis that would negatively affect Nebraskans and the state’s financial system. If the EPIC Choice had been carried out, the progress legislators have made up to now on tax competitiveness could be eroded and changed with an uncompetitive tax code, each regionally and nationally. The proposal’s contemplated consumption tax fee of seven.5 % dramatically underfunds state coffers, requiring a fee of over 21 % to fund the federal government at its present ranges. Meaning the legislature will nearly instantly be known as upon to extend the statewide consumption tax fee, as allowed by the statute.

After all, not all that EPIC proposes is dangerous coverage. The state ought to think about repealing the inheritance tax, as EPIC does. The state also needs to think about adopting a aggressive tangible private property de minimis exemption, which might assist take away a big variety of small companies from the rolls of this inefficient property tax. The state might additionally decouple from the federal tax code for functions of everlasting full expensingFull expensing permits companies to instantly deduct the total price of sure investments in new or improved know-how, tools, or buildings. It alleviates a bias within the tax code and incentivizes corporations to speculate extra, which, in the long term, raises employee productiveness, boosts wages, and creates extra jobs.
, making qualifying capital bills within the state worthwhile from yr one.[21]

For actual property homeowners, Nebraska at the moment employs each fee and levy limitations to restrict property tax legal responsibility. Fee limits, nonetheless, do nothing to stop elevated tax legal responsibility ensuing from sudden valuation surges, as have been seen all through the nation. For its half, the present levy restrict dates to 1998 when it imposed a cap of $2.19 per $100 of property worth. Nonetheless, the restrict doesn’t apply to bond points, which means taxpayers pays greater than the $2.19 cap. Subsequently, the statewide limitation is neither efficient nor clear as it may be elevated on the native stage.[22] Policymakers would do effectively to reform the levy restrict to make sure that property taxes aren’t rising with out justification. There are many reforms for lawmakers to contemplate. From these reforms, EPIC is a significant, unworkable distraction.

EPIC dramatically overpromises, underfunds the federal government, and will place Nebraskans in a precarious financial place. Proponents search to do on the poll what was unachievable within the legislature. Happily, the state has higher choices and may think about transferring ahead with them fairly than adopting an unproven and unsound plan.

In spite of everything, one thing could be epic—however it could actually additionally be an epic, within the sense of some sweeping, consequential story. Sadly, lots of the nice epic tales are tragedies, or at the very least contain them. The artwork of doing coverage is that of navigating between Charybdis and Scylla, however the EPIC Choice runs headlong into disaster. Both Nebraskans would face the Scyllan rock of an impossibly excessive 21.6 % consumption tax or the Charybdian whirlpool of depriving the federal government of two-thirds of its income and seeing what occurs. If neither choice is attractive, then Nebraskans ought to focus their efforts on different, extra accountable strategies of retaining property taxes in test, strategies that present each tax competitiveness and income stability.

Keep knowledgeable on the tax insurance policies impacting you.

Subscribe to get insights from our trusted specialists delivered straight to your inbox.



Methodological Notes

In calculating a revenue-neutral tax fee of 21.6 %, the Tax Basis started with the next inputs:

  1. Nebraska private consumption expenditures (PCE) for 2022, grossed up in accordance with present forecasts of PCE progress to yield a 2026 determine[23]
  2. Nebraska new building prices, derived from national-level NIPA information on new buildings, allotted to Nebraska in accordance with Nebraska’s Census-calculated share of nationwide residential property worth and grossed up in line with PCE[24]
  3. Nonresident expenditures in Nebraska, based mostly on Nebraska Tourism Fee-funded estimates of taxable classes of in-state nonresident spending, and grossed as much as 2026 ranges[25]

We then subtracted the next classes of PCE as both expressly exempt beneath the EPIC proposal or untaxable as a result of lack of consideration (no trade going down) or a federal prohibition, with changes to 2026 ranges:

  1. Groceries, by excluding the share of meals for house consumption constituting groceries, based mostly on the Shopper Expenditure Survey[26]
  2. Imputed rents from house possession and rental prices of residential leases, as damaged out within the PCE dataset
  3. Insurance coverage, as damaged out within the PCE dataset
  4. Personal schooling prices, as damaged out within the PCE dataset
  5. Used automobile purchases, as damaged out within the PCE dataset
  6. Web service, USPS companies, worldwide expenditures, and consumption financed by nonprofits, as damaged out within the PCE dataset
  7. Items topic to current excise taxes, like gasoline, tobacco, and alcohol, as damaged out within the PCE dataset and utilizing U.S. Power Data Administration information to again out the suitable share of the broader class of motor fuels and fluids related to gasoline[27]
  8. Well being-care prices borne by Medicare, Medicaid, or personal insurer funds, utilizing a nationwide ratio supplied by the U.S. Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Companies[28]
  9. Current gross sales tax embedded inside PCE, prorated in accordance with the Council on State Taxation’s evaluation of the share of Nebraska’s present gross sales tax imposed on private consumption[29]
  10. Charges of tax avoidance attributable to cross-border procuring, journey, and noncompliance, assumed at 10 % of PCE
  11. The executive price, at 0.25 % of collections

[1] EPIC Choice,

[2] David G. Tuerck, “The Fiscal & Financial Results of the Proposed EPIC Consumption Tax in Nebraska,” The Beacon Hill Institute for Public Coverage Analysis, February 2023,

[3] Nebraska Legislative Invoice 79 (2024),

[4] Nebraska Legislative Invoice 754 (2024), For Tax Basis legislative testimony on LB 754, see Katherine Loughead, “Testimony: Issues for Further Earnings Tax Reform and Aid in Nebraska,” Tax Basis, Feb. 3, 2023,

[5] David G. Tuerck, “The Fiscal & Financial Results of the Proposed EPIC Consumption Tax in Nebraska.”

[6] Id. See additionally Nebraska LB 79, Modification 314 (proposing a consumption tax fee of seven.5 %).

[7] One might plausibly argue that the tax on gross gaming revenues, which is extra of a gross revenue tax (although not, evidently, deemed precluded by the restrictions within the proposed constitutional modification), is on a sufficiently distinct base as to not be one other advert valorem tax on gaming, along with the brand new consumption tax.

[8] For a dialogue of the gross sales tax therapy of enterprise inputs, and the way such taxation impacts each shoppers and buyers, see Jared Walczak, Katherine Loughead, and Andrey Yushkov, “Kentucky Gross sales Tax Modernization: Protecting the Gross sales Tax on Gross sales, Not Manufacturing,” Tax Basis, Jan. 24, 2024,, 3-15.

[9] Andrew Phillips and Muath Ibaid, “The Impression of Imposing Gross sales Taxes on Enterprise Inputs,” State Tax Analysis Institute and the Council on State Taxation, Could 2019, material/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_us/information/2019/06/ey-the-impact-of-imposing-sales-taxes-on-business-inputs.pdf, 8.

[10] David G. Tuerck, “The Fiscal & Financial Results of the Proposed EPIC Consumption Tax in Nebraska.”

[11] U.S. Bureau of Financial Evaluation, “SAPCE4 Private consumption expenditures (PCE) by state by perform” (Nebraska),

[12] Whereas the laws taxes hire, there’s an exclusion for the rental of used property. We infer that, since new building is topic to tax, the rental of a dwelling on which tax has already been paid (or would have been paid had the tax been in impact when it was constructed) would fall beneath the exemption for used property and be exempt from tax. Had been this not the case, there could be an unlimited bias towards renters and rental properties.

[13] Even right here, it’s not apparent that this has been carried out, however provided that the research doesn’t explicitly state what annual progress fee it assumed in projecting 2026 PCE, it’s troublesome to make certain. However, complete PCE of their 2019 base yr (the Tax Basis evaluation makes use of 2022 figures grossed up in accordance with latest PCE progress forecasts) was $79.9 billion, and the EPIC calculation contains $108.5 billion as a taxable share in 2026, which represents 35.8 % nominal progress based mostly on the full quantity, or 79.8 % progress if they’d backed out housing, groceries, and schooling. That is earlier than any dynamic changes based mostly on presumed financial or inhabitants progress as a result of implementation of the EPIC plan. Suffice it to say, private consumption, which grew a cumulative 21.5 % in nominal phrases (not inflation-adjusted) within the prior seven years—according to long-term developments—shouldn’t be anticipated to soar 79.8 % within the subsequent seven.

[14] To be honest, the laws solely clearly excludes well being care bought via insurance coverage, and it’s not clear that authorities insurance coverage packages are contemplated on this definition. Nonetheless, federal legislation prohibits the taxation of Medicare and Medicaid expenditures, so these wouldn’t be taxed whatever the intentions of EPIC’s supporters, and are excluded in our calculations.

[15] Nebraska Legislative Fiscal Workplace, “Tax Fee Overview Committee Annual Report,” Nov. 20, 2023,

[16] These figures are based mostly on the research’s personal information sources, for the reason that evaluation relied on 2019 pre-pandemic consumption figures. Consumption soared through the pandemic, which arguably makes the pre-pandemic figures a greater baseline, however we now have taken the method of utilizing the newest 2022 information with changes based mostly on present PCE forecasts, which present a a lot decrease fee of progress than the EPIC-commissioned evaluation entailed.

[17] Iksoo Cho, “Native Gross sales Tax, Cross-Border Purchasing, and Journey Price,” Nebraska Division of Income, Mar. 29, 2016 (revised Nov. 24, 2017),

[18] Id.

[19] Many states have even included house on state revenue tax returns to make reporting of use tax obligations simpler. Nonetheless, compliance charges have proved to be low as taxpayers hardly ever report and remit use taxes for out-of-state purchases. See James Alm and Mikhail I. Melnik, “Cross‐border procuring and state use tax liabilities: Proof from eBay transactions,” Public Budgeting & Finance 32.1 (2012): 5-35.

[20] For a extra complete therapy of evaluation, fee, and levy limits, see Jared Walczak, “Property Tax Limitation Regimes: A Primer,” Tax Basis, Apr. 23, 2018,

[21] For an outline of tax reform choices for Nebraska, see Katherine Loughead, “13 Priorities for Professional-Development Tax Modernization in Nebraska,” Tax Basis, Feb. 2, 2021,

[22] Manish Bhatt, “Evaluating Nebraska Governor’s Plan for Property Tax Aid.”

[23] U.S. Bureau of Financial Evaluation, “SAPCE4 Private consumption expenditures (PCE) by state by perform” (Nebraska).

[24] Id., “Desk 5.4.6U. Personal Mounted Funding in Constructions by Kind, Chained {dollars},”; U.S. Census Bureau, S2506 and 2507, and

Census Bureau, “New Residential Building,”

[25] Dean Runyan Associates, “The Financial Impression of Journey,” Ready for the Nebraska Tourism Fee, October 2022,

[26] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Shopper Expenditure Survey Desk 1110 (2019),

[27] U.S. Power Data Administration, “Motor gasoline consumption, value, and expenditure estimates, 2022,”

[28] Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Companies, NHE Truth Sheet (2022),

[29] Andrew Phillips and Muath Ibaid, “The Impression of Imposing Gross sales Tax on Enterprise Inputs.”


Supply hyperlink

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Articles